Skip to main content
Veync — home

Validation module

06 / 07

AI-Generated Code Security

Finds the exploitable defects in AI-written code and its dependencies, and proves they are exploitable.

The problem

Review capacity did not scale with generation capacity

AI assistants now write or modify a large share of new code, and they reproduce the insecure-by-default patterns of their training data at speed: permissive defaults, missing authorization checks on new endpoints, string-built queries, secrets inlined for convenience. They also invent dependencies that do not exist, which attackers register — slopsquatting — turning a hallucination into a supply-chain foothold.

Scanners respond with volume. A backlog of thousands of unranked findings, most unreachable, trains engineers to ignore all of them, including the handful that are genuinely exploitable.

How Veync tests it

Exploitability first

Veync reviews AI-authored and AI-modified code for the patterns that matter, then attempts to exploit what it finds in a running instance. A defect that cannot be reached is recorded and deprioritised; a defect that can be reached is escalated with the proof attached.

What this module covers

  • Insecure-by-default patterns
  • Injection flaws
  • Authorization flaws
  • Leaked secrets
  • Hallucinated and typosquatted dependencies
  • Unsafe infrastructure as code
  • Build and supply-chain exposure
  • Proof of exploitability
  • Ranked, not an unfiltered scanner dump

What you receive

A short list with proof attached

You receive findings ranked by demonstrated exploitability rather than by scanner severity, the proof-of-exploit artefact for each one, and proposed fixes as pull requests. Explicitly not an unranked scanner dump.

  • Findings ranked by exploitability

  • Proof-of-exploit artifacts

  • Fixes proposed as pull requests

Standards

Evidence from this module maps to

  • OWASP ASVS

    OWASP

  • CWE Top 25

    MITRE

  • SLSA

    OpenSSF

Put this module to work

A validation briefing covers scope, the authorization you would sign, and the evidence this module would produce for your environment.

Named-vendor results and control-evasion evidence are shared under NDA, through the evidence annex.